The Futility Infielder

A Baseball Journal by Jay Jaffe I'm a baseball fan living in New York City. In between long tirades about the New York Yankees and the national pastime in general, I'm a graphic designer.

Tuesday, June 11, 2002

 

The Barry Bonds Walkathon

I had the pleasure of attending Sunday's Yankees-Giants matchup, the one which was somewhat overbilled as Clemens vs. Bonds. It didn't exactly live up to the hype in terms of classic showdowns, but it generated more than its share of heat, and a great ball game nonetheless. This even though Bonds never got an official at-bat despite five plate appearances. Anyway, the write-up is here.

I had very mixed emotions about the whole Clemens vs. Bonds thing. Never a card-carrying member of the Rocket's fan club, I was disappointed when in the first inning, with two outs and nobody on, he didn't go after Bonds with his best stuff and instead "un"-intentionally walked him. Worst case scenario, if Bonds connects it's only 1-0. Instead, prolonging the inning bit Clemens on the ass as Santiago doubled and Barry scored on a wild pitch.

The HBP in the third, well, we all know Roger hides behind the DH anyway. But he's 100% correct about the body-armor issue; it's ridiculous. No way Bonds hits 73 homers with an ungodly OBP without being so protected physically that he's got no fear regarding the inside pitch. That doesn't mean Clemens was right to hit him, but it wasn't surprising either. FWIW, the Giants pitcher, Russ Ortiz, essentially got two cracks at making up for it, first with a throw at Giambi that drew a warning to both sides, then later with actually hitting Jeter without any recourse. (I should add that I didn't see either pitch from the TV angles so I don't know how "intentional" either of those pitches were.)

In the other ABs the Yanks' strategy made more sense:

* 5th inning, with one out, a man on 2nd and first base open (Giants leading 2-1), walking Bonds was clearly the right call

* 7th with 2 out and the same runner situation, no issue

* 9th inning, representing the tying run (the Yanks had taken the lead), Karsay going at Bonds brought a buzz to the ballpark. But after he fell behind in the count, Karsay intentionally put the tying run on, which is a measure of the respect Bonds deserves these days, and again, one that's tough to disagree with.

Torre's thought process (fans preferring a win to a marquee confrontation) and strategy were to do what's best for the team. I felt a bit deprived because he let the air out of the matchup, but that's why they pay him the big dollars. I was pretty elated to see the Yanks escape with the come-from-behind win.

A final thought: Bonds' OBP is .569, which means that somebody's getting the guy out. It's down at .516 when you take out the intentional walks. As Bill James showed in the New Bill James Historical Basebal Abstract,, Babe Ruth comment (pages 784-785): "there's no such thing as a hitter so good that he should be routinely walked."

Comments: Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

Archives

June 2001   July 2001   August 2001   September 2001   October 2001   November 2001   December 2001   January 2002   February 2002   March 2002   April 2002   May 2002   June 2002   July 2002   August 2002   September 2002   October 2002   November 2002   December 2002   January 2003   February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   May 2003   June 2003   July 2003   August 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]