W L IP ERA K/9 WHIP K/W HR/9 BABIP dERA $02 $03(pro)The Braves as a whole had a very efficient defense; their .730 Defensive Efficiency Rating was the second-best in the NL, 18 points above the league average. This means that they allowed a meager .270 average on balls in play, which kept their 2002 ERAs down. But note that these pitchers didn't have especially good strikeout rates or control; they don't project especially well using Defense-Independent ERA (dERA). And these four pitchers look to cost about 50% more than they did last season.
Maddux 16 6 199.1 2.62 5.33 1.20 2.62 0.63 .282 3.59 13.1 -> 18.0
Glavine 18 11 224.2 2.96 5.09 1.28 1.63 0.84 .269 4.39 8.6 -> 11.0
Millwood 18 8 217.0 3.24 7.38 1.16 2.74 0.66 .271 3.42 3.9 -> 10.0
Moss 12 6 179.0 3.42 5.58 1.28 1.25 1.01 .232 4.97 0.2 -> 0.2
Total 64 31 820.0 3.05 5.86 1.23 1.93 0.78 .265 4.05 25.8 -> 39.2
W L IP ERA K/9 WHIP K/W HR/9 BABIP dERA $03If the first foursome didn't project well, this one looks even worse. Hampton was a walking disaster area in Colorado, and God only knows whether he can get sorted out again. Byrd is a gopher-prone, low-strikeout pitcher who did surprisingly well in Kansas City, but he's never put two good seasons together back-to-back. Ortiz walks too damn many guys, doesn't strikeout enough, and furthermore, has his stats camouflaged by the best pitcher's park in the game; his ERA at Pac Bell over the past three seasons is 3.32, while on the road it's 4.48. Yargh.
Maddux 16 6 199.1 2.62 5.33 1.20 2.62 0.63 .282 3.59 18.0
Ortiz 14 10 214.1 3.61 5.75 1.33 1.46 0.63 .266 4.39 4.4
Byrd 17 11 228.1 3.90 5.08 1.15 3.39 1.42 .259 4.39 3.0
Hampton 7 15 178.2 6.15 3.73 1.79 0.81 1.21 .318 5.38 2.0
Total 54 42 820.2 4.00 5.02 1.35 1.71 0.98 .280 4.42 27.4
This is also why I say that "No Corporate Ownership" is one of the few things that MLB should follow the NFL's lead on. Sure, Schuerholtz has made his share of mistakes but he doesn't make an egregious trade such as this then go to a press conference and make the statements he did, if he wasn't forced into it by someone in a "non-baseball" position.While it's obvious that non-baseball factors were involved in this decision, that doesn't mean we should let Schuerholz off the hook for the baseball decisions which painted him into this corner. Not signing Glavine was a smart move given his asking price and his projections, and taking a flier on Hampton at that price wasn't the worst idea ever. But going out and picking up a couple of underwhelming mid-rotation guys who don't project particularly well and who cost a significant chunk of change BEFORE getting caught with his pants down on the Maddux decision, and THEN being forced into the Millwood one doesn't speak well for Schuerholz. He could have passed on Byrd and Ortiz until he knew what Maddux was doing, and figured that the loss of Glavine's salary was Millwood's gain. That would have left him with Maddux, Millwood, Hampton, and Moss as his front four, at around $30 million. A bit more expensive than the Braves were willing to go, but not so much that they couldn't make up the difference in other areas. This team, after all, paid $3 million to Vinny Castilla to put up a robust .616 OPS (exactly the same as Rey OrdoƱez), and they're on the hook for $4.5 mil to him for 2003. John Schuerholz can whine all he wants about how baseball's economics stink, but irresponsibility like that buys no sympathy here.
June 2001 July 2001 August 2001 September 2001 October 2001 November 2001 December 2001 January 2002 February 2002 March 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]