The Futility Infielder

A Baseball Journal by Jay Jaffe I'm a baseball fan living in New York City. In between long tirades about the New York Yankees and the national pastime in general, I'm a graphic designer.

Tuesday, December 17, 2002

 

Severe Exposure

The Yankees, like everybody else, spent the better part of this past weekend's winter meetings in Nashville playing Let's Make a Deal with Montreal Expos GM Omar Minaya. Charged by the commissioner's office with decreasing the Expos payroll by about $15 million, Minaya figures to unload at least one of his talented studs such as outfielder Vladimir Guerrero, second baseman Jose Vidro, or pitchers Bartolo Colón and Javier Vazquez. Everybody and their mother (except my own) seems to have just the plan to help Minaya do so, often with their own beat team's interests at heart. Pinstriped pundits, Mets scribes, Sox sleuths, everybody wants in, with sometimes terrifying results ("Hard-working Epstein Has a Nose for Colon" reads one unforgettable headline).

Though it's tantalizing to envision Vlad the Impaler wearing pinstripes and patrolling rightfield in the House That Ruth Built, the Yanks' interest in this dubious sell-off gravitates around the two starting pitchers, Colón and Vazquez. Initally, their focus had been primarily in the former, a beefy 29-year old righthander whose merits I discussed a couple of weeks ago. But the latter has been drawing some favorable attention too. Vazquez is 26, in better shape, and -- a key for the Yanks -- less expensive than Colón. While the former will make $8.25 million and then become a free agent, the latter will get a raise from his $4.725 million salary via arbitration.

Here's a quick comparison of the two Expo starters in 2002:
         W  L   IP     ERA  K/9   WHIP  K/W   HR/9  BABIP  dERA

Colon 20 8 233.1 2.93 5.75 1.24 2.13 0.77 .274 3.92
Vazquez 10 13 230.2 3.90 6.98 1.27 3.65 1.09 .302 3.78
Superficially, Colón looks like the better pitcher, with that nice round 20-win season and an ERA a run lower. But as I pointed out before, the rotund one's strikeout rate fell off the table in 2002 (down 2.4 per 9 from his previous season average), and he was fairly lucky on balls in play as well. Vazquez , though he's more prone to the gopher ball, has a markedly higher strikeout rate, and much better control. Much of the difference in their ERAs comes on balls in play; the Expos defense helped Colón (.281 for the Canadian bacon slice of his season) much more than Vazquez at .302. The difference comes out in the wash of their Defense Independent ERAs, with Vazquez holding a slight edge.

Minaya knows he's got hot commodities on his hands, so he's been working to drive the price on them even higher; reports are that he's playing the Yanks' interest against that of the Red Sox. The asking price for Colón is now absurdly high for the Yanks: Nick Johnson, Juan Rivera, Orlando Hernandez AND the money to cover El Duque's salary next season (perhaps $5 million). The toll from the Sox is third baseman Shea Hillenbrand and lefty Casey Fossum for Colon and third baseman Fernando Tatis, a poison pill with his $6.25 million salary, reduced productivity, and reportedly poor attitude.

Even if the Yanks were to give in to the Expos demands, El Duque's salary would still count against Brian Cashman's payroll. Effectively, they'd be paying perhaps $13 million for Colon's spot in the rotation, hardly a bargain, and they'd be giving up two of their least expensive and most promising young hitters. If they can get Vazquez at a cheaper price, the deal might be worth pursuing; otherwise, this is too rich for the Yankees' blood.

• • • • •

The most interesting deal which went down in Nashville was a four-way trade in which Baseball Primer posterboy (or was it Baseball Prospectus centerfold?) Erubiel Durazo was finally sprung from the shackles of his oppressors in the Arizona desert. Statheads have taken "Free Erubiel Durazo!" as their rallying cry ever since the Mexico native posted a .403 average at Double-A El Paso and .407 at Triple-A Tucson in 1999, his first year in the D-backs chain. Durazo has posted a career .918 OPS over the past four seasons. But, owing to injuries and the density of Bob Brenly's skull, he'd managed only 900 plate appearances over that span. Eager to see the lefty slugger flourish in a more favorable environment, the geeks have pined for the day when a sabermetrically-inclined GM could rescue him before he passed his prime.

With this weekend's trade, the 28-year old will finally get his shot, and in the friendliest home for his type: Billy Beane's Oakland A's. Beane admitted that acquiring Durazo had become something of a quest: "This has been a three-year odyssey for me. This is probably the most aggressively I've ever pursued a player. I think I might have come pretty close to breaking the tampering rules on this one." Elsewhere, he even referred to Durazo as his Holy Grail, apparently with apologies to Monty Python.

The knocks against Durazo are his injuries (about which Beane even rationalized, "If he didn't spend that time on the DL, we probably never would have gotten him because he would have hit 45 home runs."), his defense (including an alleged refusal to play rightfield during last year's playoffs), and his trouble with lefties (career .577 OPS in about 150 PA). But the A's will gladly find a spot for him, making him their full-time DH and only occasional first baseman, and probably find him a platoon partner as well. But here's his career line against righties, about a season's worth of PAs: .293 AVG, 42 HR, 133 RBI, .403 OBP/.563 SLG/.966 OPS. Yeah, I could find a spot in my lineup for that guy, too.

Comments: Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

Archives

June 2001   July 2001   August 2001   September 2001   October 2001   November 2001   December 2001   January 2002   February 2002   March 2002   April 2002   May 2002   June 2002   July 2002   August 2002   September 2002   October 2002   November 2002   December 2002   January 2003   February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   May 2003   June 2003   July 2003   August 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]