The Futility Infielder

A Baseball Journal by Jay Jaffe I'm a baseball fan living in New York City. In between long tirades about the New York Yankees and the national pastime in general, I'm a graphic designer.

Wednesday, July 06, 2005

 

Go Fourth and Prosper

As promised, my New York Sun debut is up today. It's on the predictive value of the July 4 standings:
There's an old baseball axiom which holds that the team in first place on July 4 will win the division. While the direct route from regular-season glory to the World Series has disappeared, that maxim is still good news for the Red Sox, White Sox, Angels, Nationals, Cardinals, and Padres. If history holds true, four of those six division leaders should make the postseason.

Like most axioms, no one is exactly sure where this one came from. But as far back as 1934,a Time magazine cover story noted that in the previous 25 years, the leader on July 4 had gone on to the World Series two-thirds of the time. Since then, the major leagues have expanded from 16 to 30 teams, adding two preliminary playoff rounds while quadrupling the number of clubs invited to the postseason. But the predictive power of Independence Day remains intact.
I had prepared a chart for the article in its original form, summarizing the study I did to determine the axiom's historical accuracy (special thanks to my new research assistant, Peter Quadrino, for help in compiling this):
            Divisions    1st on      Won
Era Per League July 4 Division Pct
1901-1968 1 142 (6)* 89 62.7
1969-1993 2 101 (5) 57 56.4
1995-2004 3 63 (3) 40 63.5

* Numbers in parentheses denote ties on July 4 and are included in total.
The strike years of 1981 and 1994 have been excluded from this study.
In other words, being in first place on the Fourth is almost exactly as predictive of reaching the postseason in the three-division era as it was in the single-division era. If Wild Cards are factored in, the predictive value grows to 68.2%, as three teams in the lead or tied on the Fourth entered the postseason through the side door.

The second portion of the article deals with another way of looking at postseason chances, namely via Baseball Prospectus' Postseason Odds page, which uses a variant of a team's Pythagorean record [Winning Percentage = (RS^2)/(RS^2 + RA^2), where RS is Runs Scored and RA is Runs Allowed] to determine a team's chances of winning the division and the Wild Card. A sibling of BP's Adjusted Standings page (the foundation of the Prospectus Hit List), the Odds page uses third-order winning percentage, which is based on run elements (hits, walks, total bases, etc.) and is adjusted for park, league, and the quality of opposition and then fed into a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate how many wins each team will finish with. As of the close of play on the Fourth, here were the division leaders' chances:
Division    Leader      W-L    Lead  Win Div Pct
AL East Red Sox 46-35 2.5 61.5
AL Central White Sox 55-26 8.5 68.6
AL West Angels 50-32 6.5 78.4
NL East Nationals 50-32 4.5 39.0
NL Central Cardinals 52-30 11.5 92.3
NL West Padres 45-38 4.5 79.2
By this method, the two East divisions are the ones that are the most up for grabs, which is good news for the Yankees (up from 10.8% at that writing to 13.4% now) and Mets (a 5.9% chance of winning the division, but an 8.1% chance of the Wild Card).

Anyway, there's some analysis tacked onto the piece, much of it cut for space reasons (sigh, that's print for ya). Still, it's nice to get my name in the papers, especially when it's spelled correctly.

Labels:


Comments: Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

Archives

June 2001   July 2001   August 2001   September 2001   October 2001   November 2001   December 2001   January 2002   February 2002   March 2002   April 2002   May 2002   June 2002   July 2002   August 2002   September 2002   October 2002   November 2002   December 2002   January 2003   February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   May 2003   June 2003   July 2003   August 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]